ETG Way Handbook
  • Our Journey of Reinvention
  • Introduction to the ETG Way
  • Connect with us
  • Company
    • History
    • What we do
    • Webinars
    • Awards
      • Tony Hsieh Award
      • Most Agile Partner of the Year
      • NSCA Excellence in Business
    • Articles
    • Books
  • ETG Way - Our Practices
    • Self-Management
      • Navigating Self-Managed Teams
      • Advantages and Benefits
    • Feedback
      • Interpersonal Tension Resolution Process
    • Decision Making
      • Advice Process
      • Generative Decision Making
      • Sensing Process
      • Consent vs. Consensus
    • Meetings
      • Team Connects
      • Governance Meetings
        • What is Governance?
        • Items for Consideration
        • Core Principles
        • Governance Process
      • Tactical Meetings
      • Meeting Facilitator
    • Roles
      • Creating a New Role
      • On-Boarding
        • On-Boarding Videos
      • Lead Links
      • Feedback Escalation Process
      • Future Relationship Advice Process - FRAP
      • Role Advice Process - RAP
    • Compensation
      • Salary Advice Process
      • Cost of Living Allowance (CoLA)
      • Profit Sharing Plan
      • Employee Benefits
    • Working Remotely
  • Culture
    • Our Values
    • Inclusivity, Diversity, Equality, and Allyship
      • Building a Culture of Inclusion and Diversity Together
    • Communication Tools
      • Okta
      • Outlook
      • Webex Teams
      • Q360
      • BOX
      • Sobol
    • Other
      • Harassment & Discrimination
        • Responding to Harassment
      • Responding to Violence or Potentially Violent Situations
      • Health & Safety
      • Sick Days/Personal Emergency Leave
      • Vacation Requests
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. ETG Way - Our Practices
  2. Decision Making

Consent vs. Consensus

We are all familiar with consensus decision-making. Reaching consensus means we keep talking until everyone is in agreement. Although this process can lead to higher levels of buy-in, it often results in “watered-down” solutions and lengthy and/or repeated conversations. Consensus decision-making favours harmony over speed.

Consent-based decision-making is different. It’s used to make decisions that are “good enough for now and safe enough to try.” The GDM process is based on consent not consensus, meaning that we can only object to a proposed decision if we believe the decision introduces risk or a backward movement to the organisation/initiative. It requires participants to “let go” of other potentially better ideas and fears of future issues that arise. “Good enough for now and safe enough to try” is rooted in an agile philosophy which encourages rapid execution, learning and iteration over perfection. There will be ample opportunity to inject new ideas and react to future issues moving forward. The Consent decision-making favours speed and iteration over perfection.

PreviousSensing ProcessNextMeetings

Last updated 5 years ago

Was this helpful?